Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Israel and Iran
Anyone have an explanation for why WSJ remains one of the only newspapers where you have to pay to read their online content? They can't be making that much revenue from a paid subscription, and online content is vastly cheaper than home delivery of a paper anyway, so shouldn't they encourage people to go online?
Anyway, the point of this post was to talk about this article. Here's the concluding line:
"Although there is no profit now in complaining that Israel should have struck during the Bush years, the missed opportunity is palpable."
The entire article brings to mind two important questions in my mind. How close were we to an Israel-instigated theater in the Middle East during the Bush years? Also, is Obama's approach to the Middle East more or less likely to maintain the status quo (and as an aside, is this beneficial)?
Compared with the totality of knowledge which is continually utilized in the evolution of a dynamic civilization, the difference between the knowledge that the wisest and that which the most ignorant individual can deliberately employ is comparatively insignificant. ~Fredrich Hayek in The Constitution of Liberty