tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2737366569116410079.post2219052251110302493..comments2023-08-29T07:16:57.752-07:00Comments on Rational Ignorants: Will We Ever Be Happy?Pete Abbatehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06938045103916078576noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2737366569116410079.post-14953188036931461022007-12-30T20:53:00.000-08:002007-12-30T20:53:00.000-08:00I think the most obvious point of stasis in this c...I think the most obvious point of stasis in this challenge to the Easterlin paradox is the fact that the countries showing a correlation between happiness and wealth (the poor, and hence "developing" nations) were familiar with the standard of living present in the first world.<BR/><BR/>The most compelling argument for why money can't buy happiness is that increased wealth brings an increased standard of living, and since satisfaction is relative, people don't experience a substantial gain. This article cites research based on "decades of polling" done in countries that already had a standard of comparison (i.e. the US, Japan, western europe). Their economic growth did not parallel an increasing standard of living, but instead approached an idealized notion of how first world citizens lived.<BR/><BR/>The interesting concept here is how the realization of an ideal can contribute to happiness, not how wealth was valued. Perhaps a revision of policies to spur more goal-driven economic growth would be beneficial. Oddly, since money is intangible (and hence limited in the ways of qualitative growth), I think these programs would likely ring a bit socialistic.Zachary Pisohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10682185258572431145noreply@blogger.com